On a normal
morning drive, I enjoy listening to the funny commentary of Mojo in the Morning. I didn’t think that a serious story of rape would ever make it on to
the more comical radio show. However, this was just the case. I first heard of
the story of Mitch Albom’s personal opinion on the settlement of Jameis
Winston’s rape victim on my morning drive. After catching pieces of the story, I
decided to investigate it further. I found an article on Fox 2 News, that not
only told the original story, but also had an update.
http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/local-news/83867519-story# |
According
to the story, Mitch Albom was casting his opinion on ESPN’s Sports Reporters,
when the topic of Jameis Winston came up. The Jameis Winston rape case had
concluded with his victim agreeing to take a $950,000 settlement. Mitch Albom
spoke to this stating, “I'd feel a lot happier about this, if the woman took
that money and gave it to charity and said, 'That's not what this was
about.' I am always suspect when people end up saying, 'Well, I'm going
to take it'" (Fox 2 News). This comment caused tons of backlash on Albom,
thinking that he was calling the victim a liar. People were very upset the
Albom would even think to tell the victim what to do with her money. Albom
replied to the backlash by trying to explain himself. His opinion had not been
meant to belittle the victim, but to try to get to the point that this case
should not be focused upon money, but that of the sexual assault that occurred.
He had hoped that stating this would make people realize that if the money was
not a part of the equation, the real tragedy of the sexual assault could be
talked about more.
In my
opinion, when I saw the video of Mitch Albom’s original comment, I did not take
it in a bad light. I understood that Albom’s comment didn’t want the focus of
rape to be turned onto the focus of money. However, I know my opinion was not
widely shared, but you can form your own, by watching the original video here.
I think
this story brings an interesting spin to our class discussion. We have talked
about many topics regarding perpetrators and victims, but we haven’t really
touched on the idea that a rape case can be settled through an amount of money.
I understand the justice system wanting to give the victim something to try to
make up for everything she has experienced, but I’m not sure money is always the
right solution. There is truly no real justice for someone who has experienced
rape, and the ways they try to find peace with what happened to them varies
quite a bit. I think that until we can find a way to decrease the number of
rape cases that happen, we should turn our attention to prevention, and not
necessarily to how each victim chooses to settle and move on.
I agree with what you are saying about not taking Albom's comment in a bad light. The focus of rape shouldn't be that you can pay off the victim in order to get them to shut up. I can actually see where Albom is coming from, though it isn't politically correct to say she shouldn't have taken money, he's bringing to light a relevant issue in regards to rape cases. Taking the money really does make the victim look bad, and it also perpetuates the rape myth that women cry rape so they can get money or fame out of it.
ReplyDelete